Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis¶
Aziz, S., Arabi, Y. M., Alhazzani, W., Evans, L., Citerio, G., Fischkoff, K., Salluh, J., et al. (2020). Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: Rapid guidelines. Intensive Care Medicine, 46(7), 1303-1325.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Reserve
- The COVID-19 pandemic made this visible at population scale, and several health systems formalized post-pandemic reserve policies with explicit contingency targets and draw-down rules — a direct application of the five-role decomposition to a domain that had been operating largely on intuition, as Aziz et al. (2020) document in their rapid guidelines for managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis.
This sourceOperationalizes pandemic-era ICU reserve policy with explicit contingency targets, draw-down rules for crisis surge response, triage frameworks, and staffing-reserve protocols — a direct application of the five-role reserve decomposition to a clinical domain previously run on intuition.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Aziz et al.'s abstract confirms a rapid, evidence-based guideline for ICU surge during COVID-19; it does not mention contingency targets, draw-down rules, or any five-role decomposition.
“Given the rapidly changing nature of COVID-19, clinicians and policy makers require urgent review and summary of the literature, and synthesis of evidence-based guidelines to inform practice. The WHO advocates for rapid reviews in these circumstances.”
- The COVID-19 pandemic made this visible at population scale, and several health systems formalized post-pandemic reserve policies with explicit contingency targets and draw-down rules — a direct application of the five-role decomposition to a domain that had been operating largely on intuition, as Aziz et al. (2020) document in their rapid guidelines for managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:17fadcaaa86f · see in the full table