Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition¶
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Configural Processing
- A target part may be recognized faster or more accurately inside its canonical whole than when shown alone, despite the whole adding visual material that a purely featural system would treat as distraction
This sourceThe measure is accuracy, not response time. The part-whole paradigm as run here: a target facial feature identified more accurately inside the intact upright face than in isolation or inside a scrambled arrangement, with accuracy as the measure.
SupportedVerified against the source
- A target part may be recognized faster or more accurately inside its canonical whole than when shown alone, despite the whole adding visual material that a purely featural system would treat as distraction
- Face Superiority Effect
- James Tanaka and Martha Farah's part-whole paradigm (1993) is the canonical demonstration
SupportedVerified against the source
- James Tanaka and Martha Farah's part-whole paradigm (1993) is the canonical demonstration
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1873ab5e2bd8 · see in the full table