Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important?¶
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984). Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important?. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Allometry and Scaling Law
- The principle that properties of systems scale nonlinearly with size according to characteristic exponents, with the same mathematical form (power laws) recurring across different domains and scales, as Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) systematized across the animal kingdom.
This sourceCanonical comparative-physiology treatment of how diffusion, heat dissipation, structural strength, and locomotion impose scale-specific constraints across the animal kingdom, showing designs optimized for small organisms fail when extrapolated to large body sizes.
- The principle that properties of systems scale nonlinearly with size according to characteristic exponents, with the same mathematical form (power laws) recurring across different domains and scales, as Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) systematized across the animal kingdom.
- Economies of Scale
- The abstraction's structural roles transplant cleanly onto non-industrial substrates — most strikingly to biology, where Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) showed that organisms become more metabolically efficient per unit mass as size grows (Kleiber's-law analogue), the same fixed-investment-amortized-over-throughput pattern.
This sourceCanonical comparative-physiology treatment of how physical laws (diffusion, heat dissipation, structural strength, locomotion) impose size-specific constraints and govern allometric (Kleiber's-law) metabolic scaling
- The abstraction's structural roles transplant cleanly onto non-industrial substrates — most strikingly to biology, where Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) showed that organisms become more metabolically efficient per unit mass as size grows (Kleiber's-law analogue), the same fixed-investment-amortized-over-throughput pattern.
- Scaling and Scale Dependence
- As size or complexity increases, different forces, friction sources, and feedback loops become binding, making designs optimized for small scale actively pathological at large scale, a pattern Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) documented across animal physiology.
This sourceCanonical comparative-physiology treatment of how diffusion, heat dissipation, structural strength, and locomotion impose scale-specific constraints, showing that designs optimized for small organisms fail when extrapolated to large body sizes.
- As size or complexity increases, different forces, friction sources, and feedback loops become binding, making designs optimized for small scale actively pathological at large scale, a pattern Schmidt-Nielsen (1984) documented across animal physiology.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:18bfa9fe501e · see in the full table