Organizational Stress¶
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John Wiley & Sons.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Interference and Contention
- The former is a single-entity incompatibility problem; the latter is a multi-entity resource-sharing problem, a separation that aligns with Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal's (1964) classical treatment of role conflict as intra-role rather than inter-resource interference.
This sourceFoundational role-conflict text: establishes role conflict as incompatible-demands-on-single-occupant, structurally distinct from multi-entity resource contention.
- The former is a single-entity incompatibility problem; the latter is a multi-entity resource-sharing problem, a separation that aligns with Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal's (1964) classical treatment of role conflict as intra-role rather than inter-resource interference.
- Preference Heterogeneity and Conflict
- Role conflict concerns a single person with incompatible expectations from multiple roles—a parent told by work to stay late and by a child to attend a recital, the intrapsychic phenomenon Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal (1964) document in their study of organizational stress.
This sourceFoundational organizational-psychology study of role conflict: empirically documents intrapsychic (within-person) conflict from incompatible role expectations, distinct from interpersonal preference heterogeneity between agents.
- Role conflict concerns a single person with incompatible expectations from multiple roles—a parent told by work to stay late and by a child to attend a recital, the intrapsychic phenomenon Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal (1964) document in their study of organizational stress.
- Role
- Without the slot abstraction these would be vague complaints about a stressful situation; with it, they become diagnosable structural conditions, as Kahn et al. (1964) demonstrated in their pioneering measurement of role conflict and role ambiguity as distinct, separately addressable stressors.
This sourceOperationalizes role conflict and role ambiguity as distinct, separately measurable stressors arising from the structure of an occupant's role-set, which presupposes the existence of well-defined roles.
- Without the slot abstraction these would be vague complaints about a stressful situation; with it, they become diagnosable structural conditions, as Kahn et al. (1964) demonstrated in their pioneering measurement of role conflict and role ambiguity as distinct, separately addressable stressors.
- Role Conflict
- Role conflict is the structural condition in which a single person simultaneously occupies multiple social roles whose embedded expectation-sets are incompatible, making simultaneous full compliance impossible and forcing trade-offs that produce strain
This sourceFoundational empirical study establishing role conflict as an occupational stressor; distinguishes intra-role from inter-role conflict and documents health correlates. canonical organizational stress and role conflict study.
- Role conflict is the structural condition in which a single person simultaneously occupies multiple social roles whose embedded expectation-sets are incompatible, making simultaneous full compliance impossible and forcing trade-offs that produce strain
Mechanisms¶
- Role Review Retrospective
- The hazard it exists to catch is role overload — the point where a role's obligations exceed what any holder can sustainably meet
This sourceDefines role overload as being unable to meet all role demands within the available time.
- The hazard it exists to catch is role overload — the point where a role's obligations exceed what any holder can sustainably meet
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:18db0d61450e · see in the full table