Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report, Volume I¶
Columbia Accident Investigation Board. (2003). Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report, Volume I.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- External Analytic Challenge
- One organization needs people willing to speak; the other needs a channel that forces an answer, and has been fixing the wrong thing.
This sourceDocuments engineering concerns raised into a process carrying no obligation to answer them before commitment, leaving the decision indistinguishable from one in which nothing had been raised.
- One organization needs people willing to speak; the other needs a channel that forces an answer, and has been fixing the wrong thing.
- Near-Miss Normalization
- The structurally identical pattern is documented in the Columbia foam-strike normalisation, in pre-2008 risk-limit breaches on trading desks, and in pre-pandemic hospital surge-overflow events.
This sourceDocuments the foam-strike normalization on Columbia — recurring debris events reclassified as in-family rather than as margin loss — the structurally identical successor to the Challenger case.
- The structurally identical pattern is documented in the Columbia foam-strike normalisation, in pre-2008 risk-limit breaches on trading desks, and in pre-pandemic hospital surge-overflow events.
Domain-specific¶
- Organizational Influence Failure
- On 1 February 2003 Columbia disintegrated on re-entry; the immediate physical cause was a piece of foam that had broken from the external tank during launch and breached the wing's thermal protection
This sourceThe CAIB's finding that the same entrenched NASA organizational practices contributed to both the Challenger and Columbia accidents, seventeen years apart.
SupportedVerified against a saved copy of the source
“the February 1, 2003, loss of the space shuttle Columbia and its seven-member crew”
- On 1 February 2003 Columbia disintegrated on re-entry; the immediate physical cause was a piece of foam that had broken from the external tank during launch and breached the wing's thermal protection
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:198aee261903 · see in the full table