COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time¶
Goldacre. (2019). COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time. Trials.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Cherry Picking
- The COMPare project (led by Ben Goldacre's team, 2015–2016) audited trials against their registered protocols and found that reported outcomes were routinely added or silently dropped relative to what had been pre-specified, exactly this selection operating in the wild.
This sourceThe COMPare audit: of 67 trials published in five leading journals over six weeks in late 2015, 87% had outcome-reporting discrepancies breaching CONSORT, with 365 undeclared novel outcomes (5.4 per trial) and pre-specified outcomes silently dropped - selective outcome reporting caught prospectively in the published literature.
- The COMPare project (led by Ben Goldacre's team, 2015–2016) audited trials against their registered protocols and found that reported outcomes were routinely added or silently dropped relative to what had been pre-specified, exactly this selection operating in the wild.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:19b704afbbc7 · see in the full table