Abstract Algebra¶
Dummit, D. S., & Foote, R. M. (2004). Abstract Algebra. Wiley.
Cited by¶
29 citations across 29 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Bijectivity
- Three structural facts travel with the pattern. Counting transfer: a bijection between two collections proves they have the same size, even when neither is finite, making bijection a primary tool of cardinality reasoning. Inverse existence and uniqueness: a bijection guarantees a unique inverse, so operations and reasoning can flow in either direction. Composition closure: composing two bijections gives a bijection, and this stability under composition is what makes bijections the building blocks of symmetry groups, permutations, and reversible processes.
This sourceEstablishes that bijections of a set compose to bijections and form the symmetric group, the basis for permutation and symmetry-group reasoning.
- Three structural facts travel with the pattern. Counting transfer: a bijection between two collections proves they have the same size, even when neither is finite, making bijection a primary tool of cardinality reasoning. Inverse existence and uniqueness: a bijection guarantees a unique inverse, so operations and reasoning can flow in either direction. Composition closure: composing two bijections gives a bijection, and this stability under composition is what makes bijections the building blocks of symmetry groups, permutations, and reversible processes.
- Closure
- Each successive structure layers further axioms onto a closed-under-operations carrier, and the closure axiom is what makes "iterate the operation and stay in the structure" a theorem rather than a wish, as Dummit and Foote (2003) develop in their canonical undergraduate treatment of the algebraic-structures pyramid.
This sourceCanonical undergraduate/graduate-prep textbook developing the algebraic-structures pyramid (group, ring, field, module, vector space) with closure axioms layered into each successive structure.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The publisher's page confirms Dummit and Foote's textbook develops algebraic structures for undergraduates, but says nothing about closure axioms or iteration theorems.
“The book carefully develops the theory of different algebraic structures, beginning from basic definitions to some in-depth results, using numerous examples and exercises to aid the student's understanding.”
- Each successive structure layers further axioms onto a closed-under-operations carrier, and the closure axiom is what makes "iterate the operation and stay in the structure" a theorem rather than a wish, as Dummit and Foote (2003) develop in their canonical undergraduate treatment of the algebraic-structures pyramid.
- Equivalence Relation
- An equivalence relation is not the same as equality, a distinction that Dummit and Foote (2003) emphasise as the foundational axis along which coarser identifications generalise the equality relation.
This sourceIntroduces equivalence relations and partitions in its preliminaries (Sec. 0.1) and uses them throughout (cosets, congruences, quotient structures); equality is the finest such relation, coarser equivalences generalizing it. (Note: the prime's prior annotation described 'the algebraic-structures pyramid with closure axioms layered into each structure'
- An equivalence relation is not the same as equality, a distinction that Dummit and Foote (2003) emphasise as the foundational axis along which coarser identifications generalise the equality relation.
- Factorization
- And it bottoms out at a library of irreducibles — primes in integers, simple groups in finite groups, indecomposable representations in linear algebra, atomic mechanisms in a causal factorization — and the catalog of irreducibles is itself a deep structural fact about the system.
This sourceTreats factorization into irreducibles — primes, irreducible polynomials, simple groups (Jordan–Hölder) — and unique-factorization domains as structural facts about an algebraic system.
- And it bottoms out at a library of irreducibles — primes in integers, simple groups in finite groups, indecomposable representations in linear algebra, atomic mechanisms in a causal factorization — and the catalog of irreducibles is itself a deep structural fact about the system.
- Identity Element
- An identity element is a distinguished member of a carrier that leaves every other member unchanged under one stated operation: e • x = x • e = x, for every x with which e composes.
This sourceGives the standard definition of an identity element relative to a set and one stated binary operation.
- An identity element is a distinguished member of a carrier that leaves every other member unchanged under one stated operation: e • x = x • e = x, for every x with which e composes.
- Span
- Linear algebra (canonical): the span of vectors is the set of all their linear combinations; the closure is a subspace, its dimension the rank, the gap between generators and span what makes change-of-basis useful. Group theory: a group generated by a set is the closure of that set under the group operation, the generated subgroup being the key structural object (Cayley graphs, presentations).
This sourceSection 2.4 ("Subgroups Generated by Subsets of a Group") defines the subgroup generated by a subset as the closure of that set under the group operation (and inverses) — the smallest subgroup containing it — supporting the generated-subgroup-as-span reading (Cayley graphs, presentations).
- Linear algebra (canonical): the span of vectors is the set of all their linear combinations; the closure is a subspace, its dimension the rank, the gap between generators and span what makes change-of-basis useful. Group theory: a group generated by a set is the closure of that set under the group operation, the generated subgroup being the key structural object (Cayley graphs, presentations).
Domain-specific¶
- Automorphism Group
- This is one named output, not a definition of automorphism group generally.
This sourceTreats group automorphisms and the automorphism groups of cyclic groups.
- This is one named output, not a definition of automorphism group generally.
- Closed Set
- In algebra, closure under an operation is the minimal requirement for a subset to inherit algebraic structure: the integers are closed under addition and multiplication (a subring of the rationals) but not under division
This sourceThe standard algebra text, in which the integers are given as a subring of the rationals (Z a subring of Q) under the subring definition.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“2z is a subring of z, as is nz for any integer n”
- In algebra, closure under an operation is the minimal requirement for a subset to inherit algebraic structure: the integers are closed under addition and multiplication (a subring of the rationals) but not under division
- Conjugacy class
- Direct sum of groups
- Euclidean domain
- Field of fractions
- Frobenius normal form
- Image (of a Function)
- In algebra more broadly, the image of a group or ring homomorphism is a subgroup or subring of the codomain, and the first isomorphism theorem identifies it as the quotient of the domain by the kernel
This sourceThe image of a group or ring homomorphism is a subgroup or subring of the codomain, and the First Isomorphism Theorem gives G/ker φ ≅ φ(G).
SupportedVerified against the source
- In algebra more broadly, the image of a group or ring homomorphism is a subgroup or subring of the codomain, and the first isomorphism theorem identifies it as the quotient of the domain by the kernel
- Irreducible polynomial
- Kernel
- The kernel is not merely a bookkeeping set; it carries the full algebraic structure of a subobject: for a linear map it is a subspace of \(V\), for a group homomorphism a normal subgroup of \(G\), for a ring homomorphism an ideal of the ring
This sourceReports, for a group homomorphism, that the kernel is the preimage of the identity and a normal subgroup of the domain. States the First Isomorphism Theorem for a homomorphism of groups.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“the ideal [structure] of fields is trivial. Our approach to studying an [algebraic] [structure] through its”
- The kernel is not merely a bookkeeping set; it carries the full algebraic structure of a subobject: for a linear map it is a subspace of \(V\), for a group homomorphism a normal subgroup of \(G\), for a ring homomorphism an ideal of the ring
- Module (Algebra)
- Prime ideal
- Product of Rings
- Ring Homomorphism
- Rupture field
- Separable polynomial
- Splitting field
- Subquotient
- Symmetric group
Mechanisms¶
- Composition Table
- For a small arrow set it is the most direct realization of the composition rule the archetype needs.
This sourceFor a small finite set with a binary operation, a Cayley table directly records the result of composing every ordered pair of elements.
- For a small arrow set it is the most direct realization of the composition rule the archetype needs.
- Group Action Model
- The orbit-stabilizer relationship
This sourceStates that the size of an element’s orbit equals the index of its stabilizer, allowing the number of distinct reachable configurations to be calculated.
- The orbit-stabilizer relationship
- Homomorphism Check
- Tracking the map's kernel
This sourceIdentifies the kernel as exactly the equivalence collapsed by a homomorphism, with the quotient mapping isomorphically to its image.
- Tracking the map's kernel
- Structure-Preserving Map Specification
- The named anchor is exact: a homomorphism is precisely a map that respects the operations, and an isomorphism adds invertibility on top.
This sourceDefines homomorphisms as structure-preserving maps and isomorphisms as bijective, hence invertible, homomorphisms.
- The named anchor is exact: a homomorphism is precisely a map that respects the operations, and an isomorphism adds invertibility on top.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's ISBN resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 4 of 29 citations: 1 supported, 3 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 5 other ways.
- https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Abstract+Algebra,+3rd+Edition-p-9780471433347 ×4
- https://archive.org/details/abstractalgebra0000dumm_a8h6 ×1
- https://books.google.com/books?id=znzJygAACAAJ ×1
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/300249784 ×1
- https://search.worldcat.org/title/Abstract-algebra/oclc/300249784 ×1
Registry ID ref:19e46d99f6e5 · see in the full table