The New Odds.¶
Yankelovich, D. (1971). The New Odds.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- McNamara fallacy
- Named for US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara's management of the Vietnam War — where enemy body counts served as the dominant metric of progress despite weak correlation with the actual objective of defeating insurgent will and political legitimacy — and formalized as a fallacy by Daniel Yankelovich in 1971
This sourceThe speech in which Yankelovich names "the McNamara fallacy" and sets out its four steps: measure whatever can be easily measured; disregard what can't be easily measured or give it an arbitrary quantitative value; presume that what can't be measured easily really isn't very important; say that what can't be easily measured really doesn't exist.
- Named for US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara's management of the Vietnam War — where enemy body counts served as the dominant metric of progress despite weak correlation with the actual objective of defeating insurgent will and political legitimacy — and formalized as a fallacy by Daniel Yankelovich in 1971
Mechanisms¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:1b2aacabf4ec · see in the full table