Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision

Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004). Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2004

DOI

10.1017/cbo9780511811685

ISBN

9780521540513

DOI registrant

Cambridge University Press

Link

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811685

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Domain-specific

• Direct Linear Transformation
  • The coefficients are defined only up to an overall nonzero scale because projective points themselves are homogeneous.
• Geometric Transformation
  • … admissible transformation group generally leaves fewer properties invariant: Euclidean geometry distinguishes distance, affine geometry forgets distance and angle but retains affine incidence and division ratios, and projective geometry retains still less metric structure while preserving incidence and cross-ratio.

    This sourceProjective transformations, their hierarchy, homogeneous coordinates, and computer-vision applications.

• Random sample consensus
  • The entry is conceptual and nonprocedural; it does not provide surveillance, targeting, evasion, or deployment instructions, and application suitability requires domain-specific validation.

Mechanisms

• Scale and Foreshortening Overlay
  • Its ellipse test rests on plain geometry: a circle under linear projection images as an ellipse, and the minor-to-major axis ratio encodes the plane's tilt, so a wrong ratio is a measurable orientation error.

    This sourceExplains that projective imaging can transform a circle into an ellipse.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.

• https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/multiple-view-geometry-in-computer-vision/0B6F289C78B2B23F596CAA76D3D43F7A ×1

Registry ID ref:1b698c1f6d9d · see in the full table