Duet-splitting and the Evolution of Gibbon Songs

GEISSMANN, T. (2002). Duet-splitting and the Evolution of Gibbon Songs. Biological Reviews, 77(1), 57-76.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2002

Volume

77

Issue

1

Pages

57-76

DOI

10.1017/s1464793101005826

DOI registrant

Wiley

Link

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005826

Cited from

linguistics_semiotics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Adjacency Pair
  • Choreography and animal duetting. Lead/follow as adjacency structure, where a mismatched response is felt as a stumble; and gibbon, wren, and frog duets where one element projects a partner's response within a temporal window.

    This sourceDocuments coordinated, window-bounded vocal duetting in which mated gibbons combine songs in a rigid pattern, one animal's call projecting a partner's response within a temporal window — the biological adjacency-pair case.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    The abstract documents coordinated, rigidly patterned duetting between mated gibbons, but says nothing about wrens, frogs, or lead/follow stumble structure, so it supports only the gibbon half of this claim.

    “In most, but not all, species, mated pairs may characteristically combine their songs in a relatively rigid pattern to produce coordinated duet songs.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:1b9c4faeb87e · see in the full table