Procedural Justice

Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1975

Link

https://archive.org/details/proceduraljustic0000thib

Cited from

law_governance, philosophy

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)

  • This sourceLawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inaugural experiments showing disputants prefer procedures granting them process control (voice) and ground 'fairness' in process rather than decision control — supports the workplace-promotion example (D49-009).

• Equity
  • The decision-maker explains why the standard rule is being modified and how the particular remedy serves justice, a procedural-justice requirement Thibaut and Walker (1975) document as essential to perceived legitimacy of discretionary forums.
• Fairness
  • A procedure may be impartial yet yield substantively unfair outcomes if the rules themselves are unjust; conversely, a substantively fair outcome reached through biased procedure loses legitimacy.
• Procedural Fairness (Due Process)
  • Immigration adjudication is a particularly stressed instance, where the stakes (asylum, deportation, family reunification, safety from persecution) are quintessentially high and where Thibaut and Walker's (1975) experimental work on procedural justice shows that disputants accord greater legitimacy to adversary procedures granting them voice and control over the presentation of evidence than to inquisitorial alternatives, even when both produce identical outcomes.

    This sourceLawrence Erlbaum. Inaugural experimental program on procedural justice; shows that disputants prefer adversary procedures granting them process control (voice in evidence presentation) over inquisitorial procedures even when outcomes are held constant, and ground "fairness" in process control rather than decision control.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.

• https://books.google.com/books/about/Procedural_Justice.html?id=2l5_QgAACAAJ ×1
• https://www.google.com/books/edition/Procedural_Justice/2l5_QgAACAAJ ×1

Registry ID ref:1bb92f09dfe7 · see in the full table