Procedural Justice¶
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
- An employee at a tech company alleges they were passed over for promotion due to their disability, violating the company's equal-opportunity policy—a workplace dispute whose resolution depends heavily on the procedural-justice dynamics Thibaut and Walker (1975) experimentally identified, where parties' acceptance of outcomes turns on whether they had voice and the decider observed neutral process.
This sourceLawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inaugural experiments showing disputants prefer procedures granting them process control (voice) and ground 'fairness' in process rather than decision control — supports the workplace-promotion example (D49-009).
- An employee at a tech company alleges they were passed over for promotion due to their disability, violating the company's equal-opportunity policy—a workplace dispute whose resolution depends heavily on the procedural-justice dynamics Thibaut and Walker (1975) experimentally identified, where parties' acceptance of outcomes turns on whether they had voice and the decider observed neutral process.
- Equity
- Fairness
- Procedural Fairness (Due Process)
- Immigration adjudication is a particularly stressed instance, where the stakes (asylum, deportation, family reunification, safety from persecution) are quintessentially high and where Thibaut and Walker's (1975) experimental work on procedural justice shows that disputants accord greater legitimacy to adversary procedures granting them voice and control over the presentation of evidence than to inquisitorial alternatives, even when both produce identical outcomes.
This sourceLawrence Erlbaum. Inaugural experimental program on procedural justice; shows that disputants prefer adversary procedures granting them process control (voice in evidence presentation) over inquisitorial procedures even when outcomes are held constant, and ground "fairness" in process control rather than decision control.
- Immigration adjudication is a particularly stressed instance, where the stakes (asylum, deportation, family reunification, safety from persecution) are quintessentially high and where Thibaut and Walker's (1975) experimental work on procedural justice shows that disputants accord greater legitimacy to adversary procedures granting them voice and control over the presentation of evidence than to inquisitorial alternatives, even when both produce identical outcomes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://books.google.com/books/about/Procedural_Justice.html?id=2l5_QgAACAAJ ×1
- https://www.google.com/books/edition/Procedural_Justice/2l5_QgAACAAJ ×1
Registry ID ref:1bb92f09dfe7 · see in the full table