Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes, daß zwischen je zwey Werthen, die ein entgegengesetztes Resultat gewähren, wenigstens eine reelle Wurzel der Gleichung liege¶
Bolzano, B. (1817). Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes, daß zwischen je zwey Werthen, die ein entgegengesetztes Resultat gewähren, wenigstens eine reelle Wurzel der Gleichung liege.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Boundedness
- The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem links the two notions: in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence — so boundedness implies convergence-of-some-subsequence, even when the full sequence does not converge.
This sourceearliest rigorous treatment of the intermediate-value theorem and the supremum property; uses the lemma that every bounded infinite sequence has a convergent subsequence, anticipating the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem.
- The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem links the two notions: in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence — so boundedness implies convergence-of-some-subsequence, even when the full sequence does not converge.
- Completeness
- Bolzano (1817) anticipated the least-upper-bound principle in his analytic proof of the intermediate value theorem, supplying the first rigorous non-geometric treatment of the supremum-completeness idea.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Bolzano's 1817 treatise rejects geometric proofs of the theorem and proves a greatest-bound lemma used in his analytic proof; it makes no 'first' claim.
“so gibt es alle- mah! eine Größe V, welche die größte derjenigen ist, von denen behauptet werden kann, daß alle kleineren x die Eigeu-”
- Bolzano (1817) anticipated the least-upper-bound principle in his analytic proof of the intermediate value theorem, supplying the first rigorous non-geometric treatment of the supremum-completeness idea.
- Continuity
- Topology
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 4 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 2 other ways.
- https://eudml.org/doc/296330 ×1
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0315086080900361 ×1
Registry ID ref:1bef98a4555f · see in the full table