Skip to content

Translingual Practice

Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. Routledge.

Type
Book
Intellectual base
Review or monograph
Year
2013
Link
https://www.routledge.com/Translingual-Practice-Global-Englishes-and-Cosmopolitan-Relations/Canagarajah/p/book/9780415684002
Cited from
linguistics_semiotics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Code-Switching
    • (3) drawing on the speaker's full repertoire of codes as an active resource, not treating any one as the default;

      This sourceDevelops translingual/codemeshing practice in which speakers deploy their full linguistic repertoire as an active resource rather than treating one code as default, and argues for an asset (not deficit) framing.

      Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

      Review blurb summarizes Canagarajah's argument that multilinguals mix diverse resources and reject deficit labels, supporting the claim's core but not its 'full range' and 'strategically' wording.

      “both in conversation and academic writing, there is room for multilinguals to engage in translingual practice, mixing their diverse linguistic and cultural resources in their language use to negotiate new norms of acceptance. These are valuable insights, as they invite us to consider the possibility of multilinguals acting as agents of linguistic change, instead of being trapped in a deficiency label of being a …”

      From the work's full text.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:1bf5caca7b0c · see in the full table