La prévision¶
de Finetti, B. (1937). La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Bayesian Updating
- The subjective-versus-objective interpretation tension
This sourceFounding Dutch-book/coherence argument for subjective probability. SUPPORTS marker 006 (subjective-vs-objective interpretation tension).
- The subjective-versus-objective interpretation tension
- Probability
- The Dutch-book argument from de Finetti (1937)
This sourceFounding Dutch-book argument that coherence (satisfaction of probabilistic axioms) is the criterion for rational belief.
- The Dutch-book argument from de Finetti (1937)
- Uncertainty
- what is currently known, inferred, assumed, or guessed; (3) the probability or belief assignment
This sourceFounding Dutch-book argument that coherence (satisfaction of probabilistic axioms) is the criterion for rational belief.
- what is currently known, inferred, assumed, or guessed; (3) the probability or belief assignment
Domain-specific¶
- Dutch Book Arguments
- De Finetti's original work is an historical source for the subjective-probability approach; the finite betting definition and theorem used here are stated explicitly by Fedel, Hosni and Montagna.
This sourceCited for original historical provenance, not for a page-specific quotation.
- De Finetti's original work is an historical source for the subjective-probability approach; the finite betting definition and theorem used here are stated explicitly by Fedel, Hosni and Montagna.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1c0c26f9f9e6 · see in the full table