Materialized Views¶
Chirkova, R., & Yang, J. (2011). Materialized Views. Foundations and Trends in Databases.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Precomputation and Materialization
- "Incorrect" and "no longer current" call for entirely different repairs, and conflating them sends investigation in exactly the wrong direction.
This sourceStates that a materialized view's stored contents go out of date as soon as its base tables change and must be repaired by incremental maintenance or recomputation, a failure of currency distinct from a wrong query.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Its abstract establishes that stored view contents must be maintained as base tables change — the currency half — but never contrasts 'incorrect' with 'no longer current' or the repairs each needs.
“We cover three fundamental problems: (1) maintaining materialized views efficiently when the base tables change, (2) using materialized views effectively to improve performance and availability, and (3) selecting which views to materialize.”
- "Incorrect" and "no longer current" call for entirely different repairs, and conflating them sends investigation in exactly the wrong direction.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1c49a712cc24 · see in the full table