Democracy, Accountability, and Representation¶
Przeworski, A., Stokes, & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Governance
- If no decision can be appealed or revised, the system cannot correct errors or adapt to new information, a tension Przeworski, Stokes, and Manin (1999) anatomize across electoral and bureaucratic accountability regimes.
This sourceEdited volume examining whether electoral accountability and checks between government, parliament, and bureaucracy are sufficient to induce responsive representation—anatomizing how accountability mechanisms can both enforce responsiveness and constrain governance, supporting the accountability-without-ossification tension.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The publisher's abstract documents the volume's electoral-accountability and government/parliament/bureaucracy checks-and-balances halves, but says nothing about appeal, revision, or error correction, so only the claim's framing is backed.
“This book examines whether the mechanisms of accountability characteristic of democratic systems are sufficient to induce the representatives to act in the best interest of the represented. The first part of the volume focuses on the role of elections, distinguishing different ways in which they may cause representation. The second part is devoted to the role of checks and balances, between the government and the …”
- If no decision can be appealed or revised, the system cannot correct errors or adapt to new information, a tension Przeworski, Stokes, and Manin (1999) anatomize across electoral and bureaucratic accountability regimes.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1c5ed3423cd5 · see in the full table