Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus¶
Karatzas, I., & Shreve, S. E. (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. Springer.
Cited by¶
7 citations across 7 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Stochastic Process
- The index set is continuous time \(t \ge 0\); the state space is the real line; at each index \(W_t\) is a random variable (Gaussian with mean $0$ and variance \(t\)); and the single joint law is specified by the finite-dimensional distributions: for any finite set of times \(0 \le t_1 < \cdots < t_n\), the vector \((W_{t_1}, \dots, W_{t_n})\) is jointly Gaussian with covariance \(\operatorname{Cov}(W_s, W_t) = \min(s,t)\).
This sourceStandard reference for the Wiener process, its finite-dimensional Gaussian law with min(s,t) covariance, and its Markov, martingale, and Lévy structure.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The publisher abstract confirms this is a graduate text built around Brownian motion, but it says nothing about Gaussian finite-dimensional distributions or the min(s,t) covariance, so the quantified half of the claim is unread.
“The vehicle chosen for this exposition is Brownian motion, which is presented as the canonical example of both a martingale and a Markov process with continuous paths.”
- The index set is continuous time \(t \ge 0\); the state space is the real line; at each index \(W_t\) is a random variable (Gaussian with mean $0$ and variance \(t\)); and the single joint law is specified by the finite-dimensional distributions: for any finite set of times \(0 \le t_1 < \cdots < t_n\), the vector \((W_{t_1}, \dots, W_{t_n})\) is jointly Gaussian with covariance \(\operatorname{Cov}(W_s, W_t) = \min(s,t)\).
Domain-specific¶
- Diffusion Process
- Generalized Wiener process
- Itô isometry
- Natural filtration
- Progressively measurable process
- Reflection principle (Wiener process)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 7 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1d4d30016e89 · see in the full table