Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food additive¶
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). (2013). Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food additive. EFSA Journal.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level)
- In long-term rodent feeding studies, the highest dose producing no significant adverse effect was on the order of 4000 mg per kilogram of body weight per day
This sourceEFSA's re-evaluation of aspartame, which identifies a NOAEL of 4000 mg/kg bw/day from chronic animal toxicity studies and confirms the resulting ADI of 40 mg/kg bw/day.
SupportedVerified against the source
- In long-term rodent feeding studies, the highest dose producing no significant adverse effect was on the order of 4000 mg per kilogram of body weight per day
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1de23bb7bc18 · see in the full table