Field Manual 5-0¶
Headquarters, Department of the Army. (2010). Field Manual 5-0: The Operations Process. U.S. Department of the Army.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Operational Design
- Joint operation planning — the home: the JP 5-0 / ADRP 5-0 design phase inserted before detailed course-of-action development, where the environment is characterised, the problem defined, and the operational approach developed. Operational-approach development — producing the conceptual product (lines of effort, decisive conditions, end-state criteria) that subsequently guides and constrains planning, held distinct from the executable plan. Commander-and-staff problem framing — the staff process of making the load-bearing problem statement explicit and contestable rather than assumed, the step that prevents solving the wrong problem with high precision. Counterinsurgency and stabilisation doctrine — the post-2004 US/UK shift that made operational design explicit precisely because earlier campaigns generated plans without grounded environmental understanding
This sourceFM 5-0 (March 2010) is the artefact by which US Army doctrine made design explicit - its Chapter 3 introduces design for 'complex ill-structured problems' and incorporates it into the operations process - which dates the US half of the shift; it is capstone operations doctrine rather than counterinsurgency doctrine, and covers nothing on the UK side.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Joint operation planning — the home: the JP 5-0 / ADRP 5-0 design phase inserted before detailed course-of-action development, where the environment is characterised, the problem defined, and the operational approach developed. Operational-approach development — producing the conceptual product (lines of effort, decisive conditions, end-state criteria) that subsequently guides and constrains planning, held distinct from the executable plan. Commander-and-staff problem framing — the staff process of making the load-bearing problem statement explicit and contestable rather than assumed, the step that prevents solving the wrong problem with high precision. Counterinsurgency and stabilisation doctrine — the post-2004 US/UK shift that made operational design explicit precisely because earlier campaigns generated plans without grounded environmental understanding
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:1f6dbcd6bd78 · see in the full table