Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Laser Designation Operations (Joint Pub 3-09.1)¶
Staff, U. S. J. C. o. (1999). Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Laser Designation Operations (Joint Pub 3-09.1).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Joint Attention
- Design collaboration: critique sessions that direct attention to the same artifact, where without joint attention the critique misfires. Military and tactical coordination: target designation, laser-painting, and deictic radio calls, where the target must enter the shared attention frame before action.
This sourceCodifies laser target designation and call-for-fire procedures by which a forward observer/controller establishes a shared, confirmed target for aircraft before engagement — deliberate establishment of a common attention frame before action.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
JP 3-09.1 supports the military half: laser designation of targets with coordinated voice calls such as 'Laser on' and target hand-off. It does not use shared-attention concepts and has nothing on design critiques.
““Designate” is used when communicating digitally; in voice communications, the command is “Laser on.””
- Design collaboration: critique sessions that direct attention to the same artifact, where without joint attention the critique misfires. Military and tactical coordination: target designation, laser-painting, and deictic radio calls, where the target must enter the shared attention frame before action.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:204156156f3a · see in the full table