Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction¶
Sternberg, M. (1978). Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Narrative Gap
- Literature and reader-response narratology — the home use, from classical in medias res through modernist withholding (Hemingway's iceberg as a gap-calibration principle, Faulkner's withheld revelations), theorized by Iser, Genette, and Sternberg
This sourceSternberg's Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction, which treats in medias res and the distribution of expositional material.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“and others “deform chronology” by plunging [in medias res]. But since expositiay forms the basis of the”
- Literature and reader-response narratology — the home use, from classical in medias res through modernist withholding (Hemingway's iceberg as a gap-calibration principle, Faulkner's withheld revelations), theorized by Iser, Genette, and Sternberg
- Audience Reveal
- Setup and Payoff
- Exposition supplied after a resolution may explain it retroactively, but it did not prepare the audience and therefore cannot do the same earnedness work
This sourceSternberg's study of preliminary versus delayed exposition establishes that the placement of expositional material relative to the event it bears on changes the reader's experience; the evaluative language of earnedness is the article's, not his.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Exposition supplied after a resolution may explain it retroactively, but it did not prepare the audience and therefore cannot do the same earnedness work
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:20ed15d70bec · see in the full table