A theory of regret regulation 1.0¶
Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3-18.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Regret
- The structural insight is robust across substrates within the agentic cluster: a gambler weighing the path not taken, a bandit algorithm bounding its lifetime reward gap, a clinician second-guessing a treatment window, and a bidder shading against the winner's curse all instantiate the same comparison — not outcome-versus-expectation but outcome-versus-best-alternative.
This sourceComprehensive theory distinguishing regret from related emotions across psychology, economics, and marketing; grounds the cross-substrate outcome-versus-best-alternative comparison and the transfer of anticipated-regret findings into market/consumer design.
- The structural insight is robust across substrates within the agentic cluster: a gambler weighing the path not taken, a bandit algorithm bounding its lifetime reward gap, a clinician second-guessing a treatment window, and a bidder shading against the winner's curse all instantiate the same comparison — not outcome-versus-expectation but outcome-versus-best-alternative.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:22112babe6c0 · see in the full table