ISO 26324:2012 Information and documentation — Digital object identifier system

International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO 26324:2012 Information and documentation — Digital object identifier system.

Type

Standard

Intellectual base

Reference work

Year

2012

Link

https://www.iso.org/standard/43506.html

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Domain-specific

• Access URL
  • Over the archive's lifetime the backing storage, mirrors, and delivery paths can change without the DOI changing, so a paper citing the DOI still resolves even after the files have physically relocated

    This sourceThe DOI system's resolution indirection, by which a DOI keeps resolving after the object relocates.

• Citation Pointer
  • The resolution half is the DOI, a string of the form 10.<registrant>/<suffix> (for example 10.1000/182), registered with an agency such as Crossref and resolvable by appending it to https://doi.org/

    This sourceThe standard that specifies the syntax, description and resolution components of the Digital Object Identifier system and the principles for creating, registering and administering DOI names.

    Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source

    “ISO 26324:2012 specifies the syntax, description and resolution functional components of the digital object identifier system, and the general principles for the creation, registration and administration of DOI names”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:22322050da86 · see in the full table