Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1932). Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Precedent Change Notice and Transition Plan
- The idea that a change can be announced to run forward-only, sparing those who relied on the old rule, is the operational cousin of prospective overruling, the doctrine under which a body may change its rule going forward while protecting past reliance.
This sourceUpholds a court's choice to apply an overruled rule to past or intermediate transactions while announcing a different rule for future transactions.
- The idea that a change can be announced to run forward-only, sparing those who relied on the old rule, is the operational cousin of prospective overruling, the doctrine under which a body may change its rule going forward while protecting past reliance.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2246334761de · see in the full table