Federal Rules of Evidence¶
United States Congress. (2011). Federal Rules of Evidence: Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence. United States Code.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Chain-of-Custody Evidence Review
- The discipline that guards against this is contemporaneous logging plus tamper-evident seals, so the record cannot be quietly rewritten, and anchoring the standard to the evidentiary requirement that an item be shown to be what its proponent claims.
This sourceR. Evid. 901 (1975). Requires authentication evidence sufficient to support a finding that an item is what its proponent claims it is.
- The discipline that guards against this is contemporaneous logging plus tamper-evident seals, so the record cannot be quietly rewritten, and anchoring the standard to the evidentiary requirement that an item be shown to be what its proponent claims.
- Question–Evidence Matrix
- It is the working equivalent of a legal relevance rule: a standard that admits information only if it has a tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable, decided independently of how compelling any particular item happens to feel.
This sourceDefines relevant evidence as evidence tending to make a consequential fact more or less probable.
- It is the working equivalent of a legal relevance rule: a standard that admits information only if it has a tendency to make a fact of consequence more or less probable, decided independently of how compelling any particular item happens to feel.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:237cb6cc6b9b · see in the full table