Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (1960). Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Least-Restrictive Alternative Screen
- This is the least restrictive means idea familiar from necessity review — a restriction fails if a less intrusive measure would serve the same legitimate end.
This sourceHolds that even a legitimate governmental end cannot justify a broad restriction when less intrusive means can achieve that end.
- This is the least restrictive means idea familiar from necessity review — a restriction fails if a less intrusive measure would serve the same legitimate end.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:238a9be6108b · see in the full table