Debate: To nudge or not to nudge

Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123-136.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2010

Link

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.xmatched

Cited from

law_governance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Primes

• Mandatory vs. Default Norms
  • This creates a long-running normative dispute: Conly (2013) argues that systematic cognitive limitations justify "coercive paternalism" that overrides consensual choices for the chooser's own good, while Hausman and Welch (2010) and Sugden (2008) counter that even soft, default-based nudges raise serious autonomy concerns and that incoherent or mutable preferences do not, by themselves, license third-party override.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:239a88371b27 · see in the full table