The U.S. is replacing NAD83 with NATRF2022¶
Erickson, C., Banham, G., Berg, R., Chessie, J., Craymer, M., Donahue, B., Tardif, R., et al. (2019/2020). The U.S. is replacing NAD83 with NATRF2022: what this means for Canada. Geomatica, 73(4), 99-110.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Reference Standard Decay
- In surveying, spatial datums are periodically updated to reflect tectonic motion, so positions recorded against an old datum are silently wrong against the new one.
This sourceDescribes the periodic replacement of geodetic datums to account for tectonic plate motion, so positions held on a superseded datum are silently wrong against the new reference frame.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Supports periodic reference-frame updates, crustal motion making positions time-dependent, and metre-level mismatches after the switch; says the main reason for NATRF2022 is geocentricity.
“At the international level, new ITRF realizations are periodically released as more data and improved modelling become available.”
- In surveying, spatial datums are periodically updated to reflect tectonic motion, so positions recorded against an old datum are silently wrong against the new one.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:23f8cc64af78 · see in the full table