Distinguishing between Restoration and Enhancement in Neuropharmacology.

(2010). Distinguishing between Restoration and Enhancement in Neuropharmacology. AMA Journal of Ethics (Virtual Mentor), 12(11).

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2010

Volume

12

Issue

11

Link

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/distinguishing-between-restoration-and-enhancement-neuropharmacology/2010-11

Cited from

history_historiography

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Conservation Event
  • The bounded intervention is a therapy program oriented by that baseline, and the predicted over-application failure is precise: a program that pushes a patient past premorbid function has moved the reference and is no longer conservation but enhancement under rehabilitation's name.

    This sourceDraws the restoration-vs-enhancement line by the patient's own baseline: returning a person to former function is restoration, while pushing performance beyond their established baseline is enhancement.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    Supports the general baseline-relative line between restoring former function and enhancing beyond it, but only for cognitive drugs and age-related decline, not rehabilitation therapy.

    “Prescribing a cognitive enhancement for a 60-year-old patient in good health who exhibits AAMI is restoring that individual’s former function, while prescribing the same drug for a 25-year-old, who is at the peak of his or her cognitive function, is enhancement”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:246f05fea62a · see in the full table