Regulatory Entrepreneurship¶
Pollman, E., & Barry, J. M. (2017). Regulatory Entrepreneurship. Southern California Law Review.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Incumbent Backlash
- Canonical cases include Tesla versus state-level dealer-franchise laws mobilised by dealer associations, Uber and Lyft versus taxi-medallion-holder lobbying and municipal regulation, telemedicine versus state medical board licensing structures, and generic pharmaceuticals versus brand-name incumbent patent-thicket layering and citizen-petition filings at the FDA
This sourceAn analysis of 'regulatory entrepreneurship' naming Tesla and Uber among the companies that have become agents of legal change by targeting state and local laws. An account of regulatory entrepreneurship in which firms such as Uber mobilise users for political support and press state and local law for changes that accommodate their business model.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“it has become increasingly salient in recent years as companies from Airbnb to Tesla, and from DraftKings to Uber, have become agents of legal change.”
- Canonical cases include Tesla versus state-level dealer-franchise laws mobilised by dealer associations, Uber and Lyft versus taxi-medallion-holder lobbying and municipal regulation, telemedicine versus state medical board licensing structures, and generic pharmaceuticals versus brand-name incumbent patent-thicket layering and citizen-petition filings at the FDA
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:247c74999882 · see in the full table