Skip to content

The Halo Effect

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The Halo Effect: Evidence for Unconscious Alteration of Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250-256.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1977
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
250-256
ISSN
0022-3514
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
DOI registrant
American Psychological Association
Link
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
Cited from
cognitive_science

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Associative Property Transfer
    • The update is the evaluator raising their estimate of the target attributes on the strength of the associative link alone, even though attending a prestigious school does not establish job competence.

      This sourceExperimental evidence that a salient attribute (e.g., demeanour) shifts evaluations of independent attributes without the evaluator's awareness — updating a target's perceived property on the strength of the associative link alone.

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      Nisbett and Wilson report that a global impression of a person, an instructor seen as warm or cold, shifted ratings of separate attributes such as appearance, mannerisms and accent, with subjects unaware of the influence. Their finding is that "global evaluations of a person can induce altered evaluations of the person's attributes, even when there is sufficient information to allow for independent assessments of them". That is the update the sentence defines, made on the associative link alone. The prestigious-school and job-competence pairing is the article's own illustration; the work concerns instructor ratings and says nothing about schooling or job competence.

      “These results indicate that global evaluations of a person can induce altered evaluations of the person's attributes, even when there is sufficient information to allow for independent assessments of them.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Mechanisms

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:2532e0b4104b · see in the full table