Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness¶
Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169-183.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Activation Energy
This sourceDevelops the change-message components (discrepancy, appropriateness, efficacy, principal support, personal valence) for creating readiness.
- Resistance to Change
- Mature practice distinguishes rationale clarity (why change, what problem it addresses) from outcome certainty (what will result), being transparent about uncertainty while clear about direction
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract's change-message framework (discrepancy, appropriateness, efficacy, support, valence) covers the rationale half, but it says nothing about outcome certainty or transparency about uncertainty.
“Explains how we used the change message components of discrepancy, appropriateness, efficacy, principal support, and personal valence and the message conveying strategies of active participation, persuasive communication and management of information suggested by Armenakis and colleagues to help an organization create readiness for a major reorganization.”
- Mature practice distinguishes rationale clarity (why change, what problem it addresses) from outcome certainty (what will result), being transparent about uncertainty while clear about direction
- Signal Decay and Fadeout
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
- Transformation
- Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 4 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2589066a1b10 · see in the full table