Design and control of warehouse order picking¶
Koster, d., Le-Duc, & Roodbergen. (2007). Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Warehouse Slotting Failure
- Because each pick, replenishment, and putaway cycle retraces the same layout, even a small per-operation cost penalty multiplies across thousands of daily transactions into large throughput losses and elevated error rates
This sourceThe order-picking literature review identifying order picking as the most labour-intensive and costly warehouse activity, at up to 55% of warehouse operating expense.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Order picking has long been identified as the most labour-intensive and costly activity for almost every warehouse; the cost of order picking is estimated to be as much as 55% of the total warehouse operating expense.”
- Because each pick, replenishment, and putaway cycle retraces the same layout, even a small per-operation cost penalty multiplies across thousands of daily transactions into large throughput losses and elevated error rates
- Wave Picking
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:25cb972ce55f · see in the full table