The JPEG Still Picture Compression Standard.¶
Wallace, G. K. (1991). The JPEG Still Picture Compression Standard. Communications of the ACM, 34(4), 30-44.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Distortion
- And in information theory and computing, lossy compression produces a known reconstruction-error pattern, visible as JPEG block artifacts or codec ringing.
This sourceDescribes lossy DCT-based compression and its characteristic reconstruction-error artifacts (blocking, ringing).
- And in information theory and computing, lossy compression produces a known reconstruction-error pattern, visible as JPEG block artifacts or codec ringing.
- Factorization
- FFT-style algebraic factorization underlies MP3, JPEG, and modern neural compression — all instances of "find the factorization that concentrates mass on few terms."
This sourceDescribes transform-based (DCT) compression concentrating signal energy on few terms — the FFT-style algebraic-factorization principle underlying JPEG (and analogously MP3).
- FFT-style algebraic factorization underlies MP3, JPEG, and modern neural compression — all instances of "find the factorization that concentrates mass on few terms."
- Serialization
- And the lossy-versus-lossless distinction notes that many serializations drop information by design — JPEG loses pixel detail, a contract loses tone of voice, the central dogma loses folding intermediates — which turns lossiness from an accident into a design question: which lost detail matters for the purpose at hand?
This sourceDescribes the JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918) standard, an explicitly lossy image encoding that discards perceptually less-significant detail by design — lossy serialization as a deliberate fidelity tradeoff.
- And the lossy-versus-lossless distinction notes that many serializations drop information by design — JPEG loses pixel detail, a contract loses tone of voice, the central dogma loses folding intermediates — which turns lossiness from an accident into a design question: which lost detail matters for the purpose at hand?
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:260a8a3d0e25 · see in the full table