Set Theory¶
Jech, T. (2003). Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer.
Cited by¶
23 citations across 23 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Well-Foundedness (Well-Ordering)
- Well-ordering is the total-order version of well-foundedness; Zermelo (1904, restated 1908) proved the well-ordering theorem — equivalent to the axiom of choice — guaranteeing that every set admits a well-ordering, a result developed canonically in modern texts such as Jech (2003).
This sourceCanonical reference for modern axiomatic set theory; develops well-foundedness, the well-ordering theorem, the cumulative hierarchy V_α, and ordinal/cardinal arithmetic.
- Well-ordering is the total-order version of well-foundedness; Zermelo (1904, restated 1908) proved the well-ordering theorem — equivalent to the axiom of choice — guaranteeing that every set admits a well-ordering, a result developed canonically in modern texts such as Jech (2003).
Domain-specific¶
- Amoeba order
- Axiom of infinity
- Closed Preordered Set
- Club principle
- Continuous function (ordinal theory)
- Generic filter
- Knaster's condition
- Kurepa tree
- Mouse (set theory)
- Normal function
- Normal measure
- Order type
- Ordinal definable set
- Pairing function
- Proper forcing axiom
- Set-Theoretic Code
- Square principle
- Standard model (set theory)
- Strong measure zero set
- Supercompact cardinal
- Transitive Set
- Tree (Set Theory)
- The definition permits incomparable nodes, so one history can split into many continuations, and it permits limit heights, where a node has predecessors at every earlier level without having an immediate predecessor.
This sourceAuthoritative reference for trees, ordinal height and levels, Aronszajn and Suslin trees, the tree property, and its large-cardinal context.
- The definition permits incomparable nodes, so one history can split into many continuations, and it permits limit heights, where a node has predecessors at every earlier level without having an immediate predecessor.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 23 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:262645998302 · see in the full table