Skip to content

Access Control for Weakly Consistent Replicated Information Systems

Weber, M., Bieniusa, A., & Poetzsch-Heffter, A. (2016). Access Control for Weakly Consistent Replicated Information Systems. Security and Trust Management (STM 2016).

Type
Book chapter
Intellectual base
Review or monograph
Year
2016
Pages cited
82-97
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-46598-2_6
ISBN
9783319465975
DOI registrant
Springer Nature
Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46598-2_6
Cited from
computer_science

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Access Control
    • Propagating policy changes across distributed systems without cascading failures requires careful coordination and eventual-consistency handling

      This sourcePresents an access-control model for weakly consistent replicated systems in which concurrent updates to access rules deterministically converge while preserving invariants — directly supports marker 014 (propagating policy changes across distributed systems with eventual-consistency handling). Replaces the non-existent Chen 2014 citation.

      Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

      Abstract only: the model makes access-rule updates on different replicas eventually converge; it says nothing about cascading failures or coordination.

      “Our access control model targets eventually consistent data stores. It avoids information leakage and unauthorized modifications. Furthermore, it guarantees that modifications to the access rules initiated on different replicas eventually converge.”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:270cabfcffea · see in the full table