Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature¶
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, Dana, & Green, S. A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. 97-98.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Ad Populum (Appeal to the People)
- Science communicators and fact-checkers lean on this concept's core test to defend a move that superficially looks like ad populum but is not: citing the roughly 97% agreement among publishing climate scientists that human activity is warming the planet
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.”
- Science communicators and fact-checkers lean on this concept's core test to defend a move that superficially looks like ad populum but is not: citing the roughly 97% agreement among publishing climate scientists that human activity is warming the planet
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:282157bc2881 · see in the full table