Handbook of Argumentation Theory¶
van Eemeren, F. H. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Concession
- The pattern runs through classical forensic and deliberative rhetoric (Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, Cicero's De Inventione), modern argumentation theory (the rebuttal slot in Toulmin's layout, pragma-dialectical acknowledgment), negotiation practice, peer-review responses, legal advocacy, and diplomatic joint statements — in each, the granting move opens space for the substantive argument that follows.
This sourceA Handbook of Argumentation Theory survey covering classical rhetorical backgrounds, Toulmin’s model of argumentation and pragma-dialectic theory among the approaches to argumentation.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation”
- The pattern runs through classical forensic and deliberative rhetoric (Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, Cicero's De Inventione), modern argumentation theory (the rebuttal slot in Toulmin's layout, pragma-dialectical acknowledgment), negotiation practice, peer-review responses, legal advocacy, and diplomatic joint statements — in each, the granting move opens space for the substantive argument that follows.
- Toulmin Model
- Informal-argument theory — the canonical alternative to deductive logic for practical/defeasible argument (alongside Perelman's New Rhetoric), where the warrant-isolation insight that contested disputes live at the inferential bridge is the model's central contribution
This sourceToulmin's model and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric as major approaches in argumentation theory, with Toulmin reacting against the then-dominant logical view of argument.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Informal-argument theory — the canonical alternative to deductive logic for practical/defeasible argument (alongside Perelman's New Rhetoric), where the warrant-isolation insight that contested disputes live at the inferential bridge is the model's central contribution
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:295d0c74b65a · see in the full table