Theory of Multiobjective Optimization¶
Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, & Tanino, T. (1985). Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Multiobjective Optimization
- Complexity-management costs include: frontier computation can be expensive (particularly for many-objective problems or problems with expensive objective evaluations); frontier visualization degrades with dimensionality (two-to-three objective problems support clean visualization; higher-dimensional fronts require more sophisticated tools); and the preference-articulation problem is genuine and non-trivial — the structure of the Pareto set does not by itself tell decision-makers which point to prefer, as Sawaragi, Nakayama, and Tanino (1985) develop in the foundational theory of multiobjective optimization.
This sourceFoundational mathematical treatment of multiobjective optimization: vector optimization theory, preference structures, and the genuine difficulty of preference articulation in selecting from the Pareto set.
- Complexity-management costs include: frontier computation can be expensive (particularly for many-objective problems or problems with expensive objective evaluations); frontier visualization degrades with dimensionality (two-to-three objective problems support clean visualization; higher-dimensional fronts require more sophisticated tools); and the preference-articulation problem is genuine and non-trivial — the structure of the Pareto set does not by itself tell decision-makers which point to prefer, as Sawaragi, Nakayama, and Tanino (1985) develop in the foundational theory of multiobjective optimization.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:29c14911ecdd · see in the full table