Civil Procedure

Friedenthal, J. H., Kane, & Miller, A. R. (2005). Civil Procedure.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

2005

Link

https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1161989

Cited from

mathematics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Closure
  • The closure of legal sources (which interpretive operations on which corpora yield admissible legal arguments) is a distinctive feature of each legal tradition, with civil-law and common-law systems differing in their closure profiles and in the design of the inference rules under which closure is computed, as Friedenthal, Kane, and Miller (2005) elaborate in their canonical treatment of res judicata and claim preclusion.

    This sourceThomson/West. Standard U.S. civil-procedure treatise; the chapters on res judicata, claim preclusion, and issue preclusion develop closure of adjudicated issues against re-litigation.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:2ad7aab9cdb5 · see in the full table