This sourceDistributed-cognition analysis of how external artefacts hold and propagate state across a team, illustrating durability, queryability, and versioned history in the artefactual locus. (Ship-bridge navigation case detailed in Cognition in the Wild, 1995.)
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs the frame that the unit of analysis is a distributed socio-technical system, not an individual head, but it reports a cockpit memory task, not the ship-bridge watch-change and bearing-log particulars the claim names.
“This article presents a theoretical framework that takes a distributed, socio‐technical system rather than an individual mind as its primary unit of analysis.”
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.