But How, Donald, Tell Us How? On the Creation of Meaning in Interaction Design through Feedforward and Inherent Feedback¶
Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But How, Donald, Tell Us How? On the Creation of Meaning in Interaction Design through Feedforward and Inherent Feedback. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '02), 285-291.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Feedforward
- The unifying residue, which survives the strip-the-jargon test, is a predictive signal interposed between intention and commitment: in HCI it surfaces as affordance preview, in governance as impact assessment or pre-mortem, in neuroscience as efference copy, but the loop topology and its asymmetric-cost rationale are identical.
This sourceIntroduces feedforward in interaction design as information about an action's outcome conveyed before the action, supporting the strip-the-jargon residue that a predictive signal sits between intention and commitment.
- The unifying residue, which survives the strip-the-jargon test, is a predictive signal interposed between intention and commitment: in HCI it surfaces as affordance preview, in governance as impact assessment or pre-mortem, in neuroscience as efference copy, but the loop topology and its asymmetric-cost rationale are identical.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2bbf5cba16ba · see in the full table