But How, Donald, Tell Us How? On the Creation of Meaning in Interaction Design through Feedforward and Inherent Feedback¶
Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But How, Donald, Tell Us How? On the Creation of Meaning in Interaction Design through Feedforward and Inherent Feedback. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '02), 285-291.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Feedforward
- The unifying residue, which survives the strip-the-jargon test, is a predictive signal interposed between intention and commitment: in HCI it surfaces as affordance preview, in governance as impact assessment or pre-mortem, in neuroscience as efference copy, but the loop topology and its asymmetric-cost rationale are identical.
This sourceIntroduces feedforward in interaction design as information about an action's outcome conveyed before the action, supporting the strip-the-jargon residue that a predictive signal sits between intention and commitment.
- The unifying residue, which survives the strip-the-jargon test, is a predictive signal interposed between intention and commitment: in HCI it surfaces as affordance preview, in governance as impact assessment or pre-mortem, in neuroscience as efference copy, but the loop topology and its asymmetric-cost rationale are identical.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2bbf5cba16ba · see in the full table