The Luring Test: AI and the engineering of consumer trust¶
Federal Trade Commission. (2023). The Luring Test: AI and the engineering of consumer trust: AI and the engineering of consumer trust. FTC Business Blog.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- ELIZA Effect
- … told they are interacting with an AI system unless this is obvious, a duty it grounds in risks of impersonation or deception; FTC guidance goes further and addresses the effect itself, warning that people "could easily be led to think that they're conversing with something that understands them and is on their side"
This sourceWarns that people could easily be led to think a chatbot understands them and is on their side, that people should know whether they are communicating with a person or a machine, and that manipulative design can be a deceptive or unfair practice.
- … told they are interacting with an AI system unless this is obvious, a duty it grounds in risks of impersonation or deception; FTC guidance goes further and addresses the effect itself, warning that people "could easily be led to think that they're conversing with something that understands them and is on their side"
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2bfee5f023ec · see in the full table