On Proof and Progress in Mathematics.¶
Thurston, W. P. (1994). On Proof and Progress in Mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 161-177.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Accidental Vs Essential Complexity
- In mathematics, a theorem's intrinsic depth is essential while the notational and bookkeeping scaffolding is accidental, which is why a reorganized proof can compress pages to lines without changing the content.
This sourceArgues that mathematics is "amazingly compressible": once the right conceptual perspective is found there is "tremendous mental compression," so the logical core of a result is intrinsic (essential) while the notational and bookkeeping presentation is streamlined away — the basis for the claim that a reorganized proof can shrink pages to lines without changing content.
- In mathematics, a theorem's intrinsic depth is essential while the notational and bookkeeping scaffolding is accidental, which is why a reorganized proof can compress pages to lines without changing the content.
- Enthymeme
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2c0cc50f3d71 · see in the full table