Measurement of Health Status¶
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989). Measurement of Health Status: Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Controlled Clinical Trials, 10(4), 407-415.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Minimal Important Difference Anchoring
- Its strength is that it connects magnitude to consequence: it is the direct cure for confusing statistical detectability with practical importance, and it stops trivial-but-significant effects from being sold as breakthroughs.
This sourceDefines a minimal clinically important difference by patient-perceived benefit and a magnitude sufficient to warrant management change.
- Its strength is that it connects magnitude to consequence: it is the direct cure for confusing statistical detectability with practical importance, and it stops trivial-but-significant effects from being sold as breakthroughs.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2cae3fbd39e3 · see in the full table