Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes

Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study. Research Policy, 8-9.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2002

Pages

8-9

ISSN

0048-7333

DOI

10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8

DOI registrant

Elsevier

Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8

Cited from

futurism_foresight

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Three Horizons Analysis
  • H2 architecture includes the transitional systems being built or deployed: the cloud-native microservices running alongside the legacy monolith; the data-lake infrastructure being stood up to enable analytics that the legacy warehouse cannot; the API-driven integrations that enable external partners; the AI-inference infrastructure being built for new product capabilities — what Geels (2002) describes in the multi-level perspective as niche-level innovations being incubated alongside the regime, gradually accumulating the technical and institutional support needed to displace incumbent configurations.

    This sourceCanonical multi-level-perspective (MLP) articulation: niche-level innovations are incubated alongside the regime, gradually accumulating technical and institutional support needed to displace incumbent configurations under landscape pressure.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Names niche-cumulation as a transition mechanism, supporting the MLP frame of niches building alongside the regime, but not the displacement or landscape-pressure clause.

    “Three particular mechanisms in TT are described: niche-cumulation, technological add-on and hybridisation, riding along with market growth.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:2cb4c42281f6 · see in the full table