Do you Floss?¶
Lessig, L. (2005). Do you Floss?. London Review of Books.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Anti-rival Good
- Consumption Rivalry
- That positive value change is a further adoption or contribution mechanism; non-subtraction alone does not produce it.
This sourceFull authored essay; consulted for the distinction between non-rival information and positive network value in language and some open-source software.
- That positive value change is a further adoption or contribution mechanism; non-subtraction alone does not produce it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:2dbfc178128f · see in the full table