States and social revolutions¶
Skocpol, T. (1789/1979). States and social revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
7 citations across 7 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Comparative Method
- Theda Skocpol's States and Social Revolutions (1979) compared the French, Russian, and Chinese revolutions — three cases sharing a surface outcome (old-regime collapse and state transformation) but differing in many background factors — to isolate the structural conditions (state administrative capacity, peasant mobilization potential, agrarian class structure, international pressure) that produced the shared outcome across the differing contexts.
This sourceMost-different comparative design isolating structural preconditions of social revolution across three cases sharing the outcome — supports the Formal example's account of Millian most-different inference.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The publisher abstract confirms a comparative historical analysis of the French, Russian, and Chinese revolutions, but does not enumerate all four structural conditions.
“And it develops in depth a rigorous, comparative historical analysis of three major cases: the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 1800s, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s, and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s.”
- Theda Skocpol's States and Social Revolutions (1979) compared the French, Russian, and Chinese revolutions — three cases sharing a surface outcome (old-regime collapse and state transformation) but differing in many background factors — to isolate the structural conditions (state administrative capacity, peasant mobilization potential, agrarian class structure, international pressure) that produced the shared outcome across the differing contexts.
- Continuity vs. Rupture
- Critical Juncture
- The decision to regulate utilities as monopolies, to structure labor law to favor unions vs. capital, to adopt a particular patent system, or to choose a monetary standard—these become critical junctures when subsequent actors find reversal costly, as Skocpol (1979) demonstrates in her structural analysis of revolutionary state-building.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Skocpol's own abstract supports only a structural, state-centred analysis of revolutionary state breakdown and reconstruction; it says nothing about costly reversal or policy lock-in.
“she maintains that states conceived as administrative and coercive organizations potentially autonomous from class controls and interests must be made central to explanations of revolutions.”
- The decision to regulate utilities as monopolies, to structure labor law to favor unions vs. capital, to adopt a particular patent system, or to choose a monetary standard—these become critical junctures when subsequent actors find reversal costly, as Skocpol (1979) demonstrates in her structural analysis of revolutionary state-building.
- Historical Determinism
- Juxtaposition
- Regime Change
- Skocpol (1979), in her comparative-historical analysis of social revolutions, exemplified this counterfactual mode by examining the alternative trajectories that might have stabilized different political regimes.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The publisher abstract confirms Skocpol's comparative-historical study of the French, Russian and Chinese revolutions, but says nothing about counterfactual method, so it backs the frame and not the counterfactual half.
“And it develops in depth a rigorous, comparative historical analysis of three major cases: the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 1800s, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s, and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s.”
- Skocpol (1979), in her comparative-historical analysis of social revolutions, exemplified this counterfactual mode by examining the alternative trajectories that might have stabilized different political regimes.
- Revisionism
- But if the target itself is partly constructed by the evidentiary base available to each generation, and if new evidence and new questions continually arise, then revisionism may be less a path toward truth and more a cycle of reinterpretation that never terminates—a structural concern that Skocpol's (1979) comparative-historical sociology of revolutions illustrates by repeatedly re-anchoring its categories to evidence from cross-national archival corpora.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Skocpol's abstract confirms a comparative-historical analysis of three revolutions but says nothing of categories re-anchored to archival corpora or of revisionism as a never-ending cycle.
“And it develops in depth a rigorous, comparative historical analysis of three major cases: the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 1800s, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s, and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s.”
- But if the target itself is partly constructed by the evidentiary base available to each generation, and if new evidence and new questions continually arise, then revisionism may be less a path toward truth and more a cycle of reinterpretation that never terminates—a structural concern that Skocpol's (1979) comparative-historical sociology of revolutions illustrates by repeatedly re-anchoring its categories to evidence from cross-national archival corpora.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 4 of 7 citations: 4 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:30be972af25d · see in the full table