Das Kapital

Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band I. Verlag.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Review or monograph

Year

1867

Link

https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/das-kapital-kritik-der-politischen-oekonomie-buch-1-1867

Cited from

earth_sciences, economics_finance, philosophy, sociology_anthropology

Cited by

6 citations across 6 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Alienation
  • This foundational analysis

    This sourceDevelops the 1844 analysis further: the fetishism of commodities and the domination of dead labor (capital) over living labor recast estranged labor in the mature critique of political economy.

• Cultural Hegemony
  • The concept emerges from Marxist theory and retains political associations that make cross-ideological adoption uneven, with the underlying critique of commodity logic traceable to Marx (1867) and the systematic analysis of class power in Capital Vol. I.

    This sourceDevelops the critique of commodity logic (commodity fetishism, Ch. 1) and the systematic analysis of class power in capitalist production.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    The text is only Capital Vol. I ch. 14 in English; it shows Marx analysing capitalist authority over labourers, but not commodity fetishism or any link to hegemony.

    “Division of labour within the workshop implies the undisputed authority of the capitalist over men”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Division of Labor
  • Marx (1867) sharpens the analysis by distinguishing the social division of labor (across firms and markets) from the technical division of labor (within a single workshop or production line), making explicit that the same partitioning logic operates at multiple scales of organization.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    Marx distinguishes division of labour in society (exchange among independent producers) from division in the workshop (one capitalist), but stresses their difference rather than a shared partitioning logic.

    “Division of labour in society is brought about by the purchase and sale of the products of different branches of industry, while the connexion between the detail operations in a workshop, is due to the sale of the labour-power of several workmen to one capitalist, who applies it as combined labour-power.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Grand Narrative (Metanarrative)
  • Metanarratives operate as the totalizing scope

    This sourceFoundational text of historical materialism; its account of capitalist development as a law-governed civilizational trajectory exemplifies the totalizing, cosmic-scope metanarrative (class conflict and historical progression applying across all societies and history) the prime cites at markers 154 and 161.

• Stratification
  • Sociology and political economy.

    This sourceChapter 14 ("Division of Labour and Manufacture") distinguishes the social division of labor (across independent producers mediated by exchange) from the technical (or manufacturing) division of labor within a single workshop under unified command, arguing that the same partitioning logic operates at multiple organizational scales while generating different coordination mechanisms.

Domain-specific

• Dialectics
  • Every dialectical articulation specifies (1) a totality or system that is the object of dialectical analysis (a concept, a mode of production, a historical epoch, a psychological formation), (2) the internal contradictions that the totality harbors — between its constitutive moments, or between its principles and its actual operation, (3) the mechanism by which contradiction becomes unstable and drives transition (crisis, class struggle, the cunning of reason, the return of the repressed), and (4) the sublating synthesis Aufhebung

    This sourceDevelops the immanent contradictions of the capitalist mode of production (use-value vs. exchange-value, capital vs. labour, forces vs. relations of production) and the materialist inversion of Hegelian dialectics; supports the sublating-synthesis/Aufhebung component (197), the materialist-vs-idealist inversion (204), and the Marxist class-struggle/Capital example (203).

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 6 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Links previously used in the corpus

Before the registry existed this work was also linked 4 other ways.

• https://search.worldcat.org/title/642762258 ×1
• https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ ×1
• https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch14.htm ×1
• https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Capital-Volume-I.pdf ×1

Registry ID ref:3115a3ba03f2 · see in the full table