A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring

Williamson, D. M., Xi, & Breyer, F. J. (2012). A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(1), 2-13.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2012

Volume

31

Issue

1

Pages

2-13

DOI registrant

Wiley

Link

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00223.xverified

Cited from

education_pedagogy

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Summative Assessment
  • The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) program (Federation of State Medical Boards and National Board of Medical Examiners, 1992-present), a program whose reliance on automated and computer-based scoring infrastructure for case simulations Williamson, Xi, and Breyer (2012) place within the broader framework for evaluating automated-scoring systems in high-stakes assessments.

    This sourceEstablishes professional criteria for evaluating automated and computer-based scoring systems used in large-scale high-stakes summative assessments such as USMLE Step 3 case simulations.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:315795e7a9e1 · see in the full table